Reuse of Spent Hydrotreating Catalyst of the Middle Petroleum Fractions

Authors

  • Safa Nabeel Abdulqahar Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Majid I. Abdulwahab Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Khalid K. Hummadi Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2019.1.3

Keywords:

Catalyst rejuvenation, spent catalyst, Hydrodesulphurization, Extraction, Leaching, Catalyst activity.

Abstract

Reuse of spent hydrodesulphurization (HDS) of middle petroleum fractions catalyst CoMo/γAl2O3 was accomplished via removal of coke and contaminants such as vanadium, Iron, Nickel, and sulfur. Three processes were adopted; extraction, leaching, decoking. Soluble and insoluble coke was removed. Leaching step used three different solvents (oxalic acid, ammonium peroxydisulfate and oxalic acid + H2O2) in separate in order to remove contaminant metals (V, S, Ni and Fe).

   The effect of soluble coke removal on leaching step was studied. It was found that the removal of soluble coke significantly enhances the leaching of contaminants and barely affected the removal of active metals (Co and Mo). It was found that the best route (sequence) was soluble coke extraction followed by contaminants leaching then decoking process and the best leaching solvent was oxalic acid. According to this determination, the removed contaminants were 79.9 % for sulfur, 13.69% for vanadium, 82.27 % for iron, and 76.34 % for nickel. The active components loss accompanied with this process were 5.08 % for cobalt and 6.88% for molybdenum. Leaching process conditions (leaching solvent concentration, temperature and leaching time) were studied to determine the best-operating conditions. The rejuvenated catalyst activity was examined by a pilot scale HDS unit of naphtha. Sulfur content removal of naphtha was found to be 85.56 % for single pass operation under typical operating conditions of refinery HDS unit of naphtha which are 1 ml/min feed flow rate, 200 H2/HC ratio, 32 bar operating pressure and 320 °C operating temperature.

References

L. Wu and Y. Liu, “Environmental impacts of hydrotreating processes for the production of clean fuels based on life cycle assessment,” vol. 164, pp. 352–360, 2016.

M. Mara and A. Stanislaus, “Waste Catalyst Utilization : Extraction of Valuable Metals from Spent Hydroprocessing Catalysts by Ultrasonic-Assisted Leaching with Acids,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., pp. 9495–9501, 2011.

J. R. Chang, S. L. Chang, and T. B. Lin, “γ-Alumina-supported Pt catalysts for aromatics reduction: A structural investigation of sulfur poisoning catalyst deactivation,” J. Catal., vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 338–346, 1997.

A. Stanislaus, Handbook of Spent. 2016.

P. Dufresne, “Hydroprocessing catalysts regeneration and recycling,” vol. 322, pp. 67–75, 2007.

M. Marafi, “studies on deactivation and reactivation of spent hydroprocessing catalyst,” 1996.

M. Marafi and A. Stanislaus, “Options and processes for spent catalyst handling and utilization,” vol. 101, pp. 123–132, 2003.

S. A. Sadeek, H. S. Ahmed, E. A. ElShamy, H. A. El Sayed, and A. A. Abd El Rahman, “Hydrotreating of waste lube oil by rejuvenated spent hydrotreating catalyst,” Egypt. J. Pet., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2014.

C. N. da S. e J. C. A. Alexandre Luiz de Souza Pereira, “Quim. Nova,” Quim. Nova, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1704–1716, 2011.

J. S. Yoo, “Metal recovery and rejuvenation of metal-loaded spent catalysts,” Catal. Today, vol. 44, no. 1–4, pp. 27–46, 1998.

W. Wang, S. Wang, Y. Wang, H. Liu, and Z. Wang, “A new approach to deep desulfurization of gasoline by electrochemically catalytic oxidation and extraction,” FUEL Process. Technol., vol. 88, pp. 1002–1008, 2007.

H. A. Abdullah, A. Hauser, F. A. Ali, and A. Al-Adwani, “Optimal conditions for coke extraction of spent catalyst by accelerated solvent extraction compared to Soxhlet,” Energy and Fuels, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 320–323, 2006.

E. S. P. B. V, M. Marafi, A. Stanislaus, C. J. Mumford, and M. Fahim, “Regeneration of Spent Hydroprocessing Metals Removal Catalysts :,” vol. 47, no. 3989, pp. 85–96, 1989.

O. Levenspiel, Chemical reaction engineering O. Levenspiel Wiley. Third edition, vol. 19. 1999.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-30

How to Cite

Nabeel Abdulqahar, S., I. Abdulwahab, M., & K. Hummadi, K. (2019). Reuse of Spent Hydrotreating Catalyst of the Middle Petroleum Fractions. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 20(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2019.1.3

Publication Dates