Improving the Recovery of Hydrocarbons in a Well in the Gullfaks Field by Injecting Sequestrated CO2

Authors

  • Cheage Chamgoué School of Geology and Mining Engineering, University of Ngaoundere, P.O. Box 115, Meiganga, Cameroon
  • Kombou Far North Court of Appeal, Ministry of Justice, Keepers of the Seals, PO. Box 60, Kaéle, Cameroon
  • Tchouate Ngankap African Higher Institute of Managerial and Technological Education, P.O. Box 1743, Bonanjo, Douala, Cameroon
  • Jules Metsebo Department of Hydraulics and water Management, National Advanced School of Engineering, University of Maroua, P.O Box 46 Maroua, Cameroon
  • Armstrong Akoteh Department of Mechanical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, National Advanced School of Mines and Petroleum Industries, University of Maroua, P.O. Box 46 Maroua, Cameroon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2023.1.1

Keywords:

Gullfaks field, coiled tubing, injecting sequestrated CO2, Pipsim software, Prosper software, economic analysis.

Abstract

The Gullfaks field was discovered in 1978 in the Tampen area of the North Sea and it is one of the largest Norwegian oil fields located in Block 34/10 along the western flank of the Viking Graben in the northern North Sea. The Gullfaks field came on stream in 1986 and reached a peak of production in 2001. After some years, a decrease in production was noticed due to the decrease in pressure in the well. The goal of this paper is to improve the production of a well located in Gullfaks field by injecting CO2 through coiled tubing. The use of the CO2 injection method is due to the fact that it is a greenhouse gas, and its production in the atmosphere contributes to global warming. It is important to reduce its emission into the atmosphere and to boost the production of oil in the well. The CO2 is injected through the coil tubing to lighten the hydrostatic column and allow the fluid to move from the tubing to the surface. The completion and PVT data are processed in Pipesim and Prosper softwares. By integrating a number of calculations by using the nodal analysis methods and gas injection methods, the results obtained show that the well is not producing and by injecting sequestrated CO2 at the flow rate of 1.482 MMScft/d with an injection pressure of 2500 psig, the oil flow rate provided by the coiled tubing gas injection is 900 Stb/d. The profitability of the project is achieved over a period of 20 years with a net present value (NPV) of $11948858.5 and a return on investment after 5 years 2 weeks.  

Author Biographies

  • Cheage Chamgoué, School of Geology and Mining Engineering, University of Ngaoundere, P.O. Box 115, Meiganga, Cameroon

     

     

  • Kombou, Far North Court of Appeal, Ministry of Justice, Keepers of the Seals, PO. Box 60, Kaéle, Cameroon

     

     

  • Tchouate Ngankap, African Higher Institute of Managerial and Technological Education, P.O. Box 1743, Bonanjo, Douala, Cameroon

     

     

  • Jules Metsebo, Department of Hydraulics and water Management, National Advanced School of Engineering, University of Maroua, P.O Box 46 Maroua, Cameroon

     

     

  • Armstrong Akoteh, Department of Mechanical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, National Advanced School of Mines and Petroleum Industries, University of Maroua, P.O. Box 46 Maroua, Cameroon

     

     

References

Fossen, H., Hesthammer, J. Structural Geology of the Gullfaks Field, Departement of Geology, University of Bergen, 231-261 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.127.01.16.

Hesthammer, J., and Fossen, H. Structural core analysis from the Gullfaks area, northern North Sea, Marine and Petroleum Geology, V. 18, p. 411-439 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(00)00068-4.

Petterson, O., Storli, A., Ljosland, E., Nygaard, O., Massie, I., Carlsen, H. The Gullfaks field, Giant Oil and Gas Fields oftheDecade 1978-1988, p. 429-446 (1992), https://doi.org/10.1306/M54555C26.

Agostini, S. A Study of the Grid Orientation effect in the Gullfaks Brent Reservoir Simulation model, A report of the Department of Earth Science and Engineering Center for Petroleum Studies, Imperial College London, p. 8 (2011).

Tollefsen, S., Graue, E., and Svinddal, S. The Gullfaks Field Development Challenges and Perspectives, European Petroleum Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 48p (1992), https://doi.org/10.2118/25054-MS.

Fossen, H. Indication of transpressional tectonic in the Gullfaks Oilfield, Marine petroleum geol. 6, 22-30 (1989), https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8172(89)90073-1.

Aduomahor, O, B., Umeagu, E., Ogundusi, O., Equere, I. (2017). Investigating the Impact of different Reservoir Property Modeling Algorithms and their associated uncertainties on volume estimation, gullfaks field, North Sea, p. 23.

Fossen, H., & and Rørnes, A. Properties of fault populations in the Gullfaks Field, northern North Sea: Journal of Structural Geology 18, p. 179-190 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8141(96)80043-5.

Graue, E., Helland-Hansen, W., Johnsen, J., Lømo, L., Nøttvedt, A., Rønning, K., & Ryseth, AR Advance and retreat of Brent Delta System, Norwegian North Sea: In: Brooks, J & Gibbis. AD (eds) Petroleum Geology of North West Europe, p. 915-937 (1987).

Ncib, O. The different methods of oil recovery, p. 3-19 (2021).

Lyons, WC, and Plisga, GJ Standard Handbook of petroleum and natural gas engineering (2004).

S. John, Forecasting Oil and Gas Producing for Unconventional Wells, 2nd ed., Petro. Denver (2018).

CS Hsu and PR Robinson, Petroleum Science and Technology, Springer, Cham, first Edition (2019).

Gozalpour, F., Ren, SR, and Tohidi, B. (2005). CO2 EOR and storage in oil reservoirs. Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP 60(3), 537-546, https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2005036.

R. John and L. Richard, Introduction to petroleum engineering. Wiley, New Jersey (2017).

F. Jahn, M. Cook, & M. Graham. Hydrocarbon Exploration and production. (D. i. 46, Ed.) Amsterdam, The Nertherlands: Elsavier (2003).

Actu, E. Sequestering CO2, a transition solution pending large-scale development, 5-15 (2004).

Bachu, S. Evaluation of CO2 sequestration capacity in oil and gas reservoirs in the Western Canada sedimentary basin, Alberta Geological Survey. 852-863 (2004).

Metz, B., Davidson, O., De Coninck, H., Loos, M., Meyer, L. Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture Storage, Cambridge University press, 443 p (2005).

De Visser, E., Hendriks, C., Barrio, M., Mølnvik, MJ, de Koeijer, G., Liljemark, S. and Le Gallo, Y. Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 2, 478-484 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.04.006.

Attavitkamthorn, V., Vilcáez, J. and Sato, K. Integrated CCS aspect into CO2 EOR project under wide range of reservoir properties and operating conditions, 601-602 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.622.

Portman, L., The Science and Economics Behind Coiled-Tubing-String Design and Optimization, SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, 25-26 May (1999), https://doi.org/10.2118/54456-MS.

McClelland, G. and Global Tubing, Innovative Coiled Tubing Technology to Improve Performance in Horizontal Completions, SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing & Well Intervention Conference & Exhibition, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, March (2013), https://doi.org/10.2118/163892-MS.

Livescu, S., Craig, S.; Watkins, T., Smaller Coiled Tubing Diameter Achievable by the Use of Lubricants, International Petroleum Technology Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Paper Number: IPTC-17815-MS December (2014), https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-17815-MS.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-30

How to Cite

Cheage Chamgoué, A., Kombou, C. L., Tchouate Ngankap, M., Metsebo, J., & Armstrong Akoteh, A. (2023). Improving the Recovery of Hydrocarbons in a Well in the Gullfaks Field by Injecting Sequestrated CO2. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 24(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2023.1.1

Publication Dates