Carbone dioxide sequestration using downhole water sink (DWS) technology: Effects of well placement on trapping efficiency, leakage, and reservoir pressure

Authors

  • Sajjad M. Abdulwahhab Petroleum Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Ghassan H. Abdul-Majeed Petroleum Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Watheq J. Al-Mudhafar Basrah Oil Company, Basrah, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2026.1.2

Keywords:

CO₂ sequestration; depleted reservoirs; downhole water sink (DWS); leakage index; saline aquifers; trapping efficiency; Reservoir pressure management; well placement; CO₂ trapping mechanisms

Abstract

      Geological CO₂ sequestration is a widely accepted technique that consists of safely and securely hiding carbon emissions from human activities by storing them underground. It is considered the main method of carbon dioxide capturing and sequestration because of its large-scale application. Use of Downhole Water Sink (DWS) systems and other advanced reservoir control technologies is driven by the necessity to manage effectively the reservoir pressure change, the CO₂ plume migration, and the leakage pathways. The effectiveness of the DWS technology in providing better CO₂ storage performance in a depleted reservoir surrounded by a saline aquifer has been the focus of this research. The study analyzed three operational scenarios to evaluate how the different distances between the DWS wells and the CO₂ injectors would affect the storage efficiency, the leakage behavior, and the management of the reservoir pressure. Scenario 1 had DWS wells located right under the CO₂ injectors which caused negative hydrodynamic interactions, decreased the total trapped CO₂ and increased the leakage indices. Scenario 2 had a tiny lateral offset which led to small improvements in trapping and tiny increases in leakage, implying partial but still insufficient mitigation of injector-sink interference. In Scenario 3, with a 10-grid offset between the injection and extraction wells, achieved the maximum CO₂ storage efficiency, where trapping gained 2.79% (431,235 tons) at a CO₂ injection rate of 20 MMSCF/day and a DWS flow rate of 12,500 bbl/day. Leakage did not change, maintaining a Leakage Index of +0.06898 which indicated only a slight increase that was barely noticeable when compared to the more varying responses in Scenarios 1 and 2. In addition, the operation of DWS in Scenario 3 led to a peak pressure of the reservoir that was lower than that of the case without DWS, as the pressure dropped from about 6150 psi to 5100–5794 psi, thus relieving some of the stress on the formation. Although no specific fracture pressures or geomechanical analyses were performed, the pressure drop is likely to create better injection conditions and also enhance the integrity of the storage area. The overall results show that the DWS wells, when placed and managed properly and strategically, can not only increase the CO₂ trapping efficiency but also stabilize the leakage behavior and provide pressure control, thus making the geological CO₂ sequestration more reliable.

References

[1] X. Ji and C. Zhu, "CO₂ storage in deep saline aquifers," in Novel Materials for Carbon Dioxide Mitigation Technology, Elsevier, 2015, pp. 299–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63259-3.00010-0

[2] P. N. K. De Silva and P. G. Ranjith, "A study of methodologies for CO₂ storage capacity estimation of saline aquifers," Fuel, vol. 93, pp. 13–27, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.004

[3] A. Mukherjee and P. Dutta, "Assessment of trapping mechanisms of CO₂ sequestration and optimization of key process parameters in a deep saline aquifer," Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 10421–10431, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04163-4

[4] M. A. Amooie, A. Hemmati-Sarapardeh, K. Karan, M. M. Husein, M. R. Soltanian, and B. Dabir, "Data-driven modeling of interfacial tension in impure CO₂–brine systems," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 90, p. 102811, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102811

[5] A. Tadjer and R. B. Bratvold, "Managing uncertainty in geological CO₂ storage using Bayesian evidential learning," Energies, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 1557, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061557

[6] J. T. Birkholzer, Q. Zhou, and C. F. Tsang, "Large-scale impact of CO₂ storage in deep saline aquifers," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 181–194, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.08.002

[7] J. T. Birkholzer and Q. Zhou, "Basin-scale hydrogeologic impacts of CO₂ storage," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 745–756, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.07.002

[8] J. P. Nicot, "Evaluation of large-scale carbon storage on freshwater sections of aquifers," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 582–593, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.03.004

[9] E. Lindeberg, J. F. Vuillaume, and G. Ghaderi, "Determination of the CO₂ storage capacity of the Utsira formation," Energy Procedia, vol. 1, pp. 2777–2784, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.049

[10] T. A. Buscheck et al., "Pre-injection brine production for managing pressure in CO₂ storage reservoirs," Energy Procedia, vol. 63, pp. 5333–5340, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.565

[11] C. L. Davidson et al., "Benefits and costs of brine extraction for increasing injection efficiency," Energy Procedia, vol. 63, pp. 4745–4749, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.504

[12] Y. K. Kharaka et al., "Active and integrated management of water resources during CO₂ sequestration," Energy Procedia, vol. 4, pp. 4221–4229, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.370

[13] P. Vaziri and B. Sedaee, "A machine learning‐based approach to the multiobjective optimization of CO2 injection and water production during CCS in a saline aquifer based on field data," Energy Science and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1563–1580, Apr. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1412

[14] W.-S. Lee and Y. Hong, "Application of machine learning technologies for optimizing CO₂ EOR–storage processes," Journal of the Korean Society of Mineral and Energy Resources Engineers, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 564–574, 2020. https://doi.org/10.32390/KSMER.2020.57.6.564

[15] H. Hassani, A. Shahbazi, E. Shahbalayev, Z. Hamdi, S. Behjat, and M. Bataee, "ML-based CO₂ saturation tracking in saline aquifers," presented at the SPE Conference, Paper SPE 218445, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2118/218445-MS

[16] F. Zheng, Z. Ma, H. Viswanathan, R. Pawar, B. Jha, and B. Chen, "Deep learning assisted multi-objective optimization of geological CO₂ storage," presented at the SPE Conference, Paper SPE 220850, 2024. https://doi.org/10.2118/220850-MS

[17] F. Meng, J. Liu, G. Tong, et al., "Multiobjective optimization of CO2 injection under geomechanical risk in high water cut oil reservoirs using artificial intelligence approaches," scientific reports, vol. 15, Art. no. 25643, July 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10111-0

[18] M. M. M. Alam, A. Hassan, M. Mahmoud, N. Sibaweihi, and S. Patil, "Dual benefits of EOR and CO₂ sequestration," Frontiers in Energy Research, vol. 10, p. 877212, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2022.877212

[19] N. Abdullah and N. Hasan, "Effects of miscible CO₂ injection on production recovery," Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, vol. 11, pp. 3543–3557, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01223-0

[20] X. Chen et al., "Enhanced oil recovery mechanisms of CO₂ miscible flooding," ACS Omega, vol. 8, pp. 24663–24672, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c03352

[21] M. Odenberger, J. Kjärstad, and F. Johnsson, "Ramp-up of CO₂ capture and storage in Europe," International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 2, pp. 417–438, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.06.007

[22] S. Ding, Y. Xi, H. Jiang, and G. Liu, "CO₂ storage capacity estimation by solubility and mineral trapping," Applied Geochemistry, vol. 89, pp. 121–128, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.12.002

[23] A. Bashir et al., "Comprehensive review of CO2 geological storage: Exploring principles, mechanisms, and prospects," Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 249, Art. no. 104672, Feb. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104672

[24] Y. Ke et al., "Geochemical assessment of long term CO₂ storage from core to field scale models," Energies, vol. 18, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18154089

[25] X. Wang et al., "Evolution of CO₂ storage mechanisms in low permeability tight sandstone reservoirs," Engineering, vol. 48, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.05.013

[26] Y. Kim, H. Jang, J. Kim, and J. Lee, "Prediction of storage efficiency on CO₂ sequestration in deep saline aquifers using artificial neural network," Applied Energy, vol. 185, pp. 916–928, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.012

[27] D. Zhang and J. Song, "Mechanisms for geological carbon sequestration," Procedia IUTAM, vol. 10, pp. 319–327, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piutam.2014.01.027

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

Abdulwahhab, S. M., Abdul-Majeed, G. H., & Al-Mudhafar, W. J. (2026). Carbone dioxide sequestration using downhole water sink (DWS) technology: Effects of well placement on trapping efficiency, leakage, and reservoir pressure. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 27(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2026.1.2