Prediction of bubble size in Bubble columns using Artificial Neural Network

Authors

  • Nada Sadoon Ahmed zeki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2009.1.1

Abstract

In the literature, several correlations have been proposed for bubble size prediction in bubble columns. However these correlations fail to predict bubble diameter over a wide range of conditions. Based on a data bank of around 230 measurements collected from the open literature, a correlation for bubble sizes in the homogenous region in bubble columns was derived using Artificial Neural Network (ANN) modeling. The bubble diameter was found to be a function of six parameters: gas velocity, column diameter, diameter of orifice, liquid density, liquid viscosity and liquid surface tension. Statistical analysis showed that the proposed correlation has an Average Absolute Relative Error (AARE) of 7.3 % and correlation coefficient of 92.2%. A comparison with selected correlations in the literature showed that the developed ANN correlation noticeably improved the prediction of bubble sizes. The developed correlation also shows better prediction over a wide range of operation parameters in bubble columns.

References

Akhtar A., Pareek V., and Tad´e M., 2007 “CFD Simulations for Continuous Flow of Bubbles through Gas-Liquid Columns: Application of VOF Method” Chemical Product and Process Modeling Vol. 2, Iss. 1, Art. 9.

Al-Hemiri A., and Ahmedzeki N., 2008 “ Prediction of heat transfer coefficient in bubble columns using an Artificial Neural Network” International J. Chem. Reactor >Eng.,vol.,6, A72.

Bahavraju,S.M., .W.F.Russel , and H.W. Blanch, 1978, “ The design of gas sparged devices for viscous liquid systems” AICHE J., 24, 454. (cited in Kantarci et al 2005).

Behkish A.,et al ,2005, “ Prediction of the Gas Holdup in Industrial-Scale Bubble Columns and Slurry Bubble Column Reactors Using Back-Propagation Neural Networks, J.Int.Chem.Eng.Vol.3.

Bhat N., and McAvoy T.J.,1990 “ Use of neural nets for dynamic modeling and control of chemical process system”Computer Chem.Eng. Vol.14,No.4/5,pp.573-583.

Cai Sh., Toral H., Qiu J., Archer J.S., 1994, “Network based objective flow regime identification in air-water system two phase flow”, Can.J.Chem.Eng.,Vol. 72, June.

Deckwer WD., and Schumpe A., 1993 “Improved tools for bubble column reactor design and scale up” Chem. Eng. Sci.48, 889-911.

Degaleesan, S.,M. Dudukovic andY.Pan,2001"Experimental Study of Gas- Induced Liquid-Flow Structures in Bubble Columns," AIChE J., Vol. 47, No. 9, pp.1913-1931. (Cited in Akhtar 2007)

Hillmer G., 1993, PhD Thesis ,University Erlangen-Nurnberg.

Illuta I., Grandjean and Larrachi F., 2002 “ Hydrodynamics of trickle –flow reactors: updated slip functions for the slit models” Chem. Eng. Res.Des. 80, (A2),195.

Kantarci, N., Borak, F., Ulgen, K.O.,2005, “Bubble column reactors.” Process Biochem. 40, 2263-2283.

Koide K., hirahara T., and Kubota H., 1966, Kagaku Kogaku 30, p. 712.

Kumar A.,and Degaleesan T., LA Ddhacs, and H., Hoeischer,1976, “ Bubble swarm Characterstics” Cand. J. Chem. Eng. vol.54.

Kumar R., Kuloor NR. 1970 “ the formation of bubbles and drops” Adv. Chem. Eng., 8, 256-368.

Leibson I., Halcomb EG., Cacosco AG and Jamic JJ., 1956 “ Rate of flow and mechanisms of bubble formation from single submerged orifices. AICHE J., 2(3),296.

Lendaris, G., (2004) “Supervised learning in ANN from introduction to artificial intelligence”, New York, April 7.

Leonard, J., and Kramer, M.A., (1990) “Improvement of the back-propagation algorithm for training neural networks”, Comp. Chem. Eng, 14, 337-341.

Lippmann, R.P., (1987) “An introduction to computing with neural nets”, IEEE Magazine, April, pp.4-22.

MATLAB, Version 7, June 2003, “Neural network toolbox”

Mewes D., and Wiemann D.,2004, “ Two phase flow with mass transfer in bubble columns” Chem. Eng. Tech. 26,pp.862-868.

Miayhara T., Matsuba Y., and Takahashi.,1983 “ The size of bubbles generated from perforated plates” International Chem. Eng. J., vol. 23, No.3.

Miller DN., 1974 “ Scale up of agitated vessels gas-liquid mass transfer.” AICHE J., 20,445.

Moo-Young M., and Blanch HW.,1981 “ Design of biochemical reactors” Adv.Biochem. Eng. 19,1-69.

Piche, S.,Larachi F., and Grandjean A., 2001 “Improved liquid hold up correlation for randomly packed towers” Chem. Eng. Res.Des. 79,(A1),71.(Cited in Shaikh and Al-Dahhan 2003).

Shah Y.T., Joseph, S., Smith, D.N., Ruether, J.A., 1985,“Two-Bubble Class Model for Churn- Turbulent Bubblem Column Reactor,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, Vol. 24, pp. 1096-1104.

Shaikh, A., Al-Dahhan, M., 2003,“Development of an Artificial Neural Network Correlation for Prediction of Overall Gas Holdup in Bubble Column Reactors”, Chemical Engineering and Processing, Vol. 42, pp. 599-610.

Towell G., Strand B., and Ackerman,GH., AICHE I. Chem.E. Sump. Ser.No. 10,97.

Van den Hangel E. I.V., Deen N.G., and Kuipers J.A.M., 2005, “Application of coalescence and breakup models in a discrete bubble model for bubble columns” Ind.Chem.Eng.Res.,44, pp.5233-5245.

Van Krevelen DW.,and Hoftijzer P., 1950, Chem.Eng. Prog., 46, 29.

Tadakiet T., and Maeda S., 1963 ,Kagaku Kogaku, 27, p. 402. (cited in Miayhara !983).

Towell G.D., Strand B S., and Ackerman GH., 1965, AICHE., I. Chem., Symp.Ser. No.10,97.

Downloads

Published

2009-03-30

How to Cite

Sadoon Ahmed zeki, N. (2009). Prediction of bubble size in Bubble columns using Artificial Neural Network. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 10(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2009.1.1

Publication Dates