Mathematical Modeling of a Hollow Fiber Module Used in Pressure-Retarded Osmosis Process


  • Farah Adil Yaseen Iraq National Oil Company, Midland Oil Company, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Ahmed Faiq Al-Alawy Chemical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
  • Adel Sharif Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Surrey, UK



Mathematical model, Osmotic Power, Hollow Fiber Membrane, Pressure Retarded Osmosis


   Pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) can be considered as one of the methods for utilizing osmotic power, which is a membrane-based technology. Mathematical modeling plays an essential part in the development and optimization of PRO energy-generating systems. In this research, a mathematical model was developed for the hollow fiber module to predict the power density and the permeate water flux theoretically. Sodium chloride solution was employed as the feed and draw solution. Different operating parameters, draw solution concentration (1 and 2 M), the flow rate of draw solution (2, 3, and 4 L/min), and applied hydraulic pressure difference (0 - 90 bar) was used to evaluate the performance of PRO process of a hollow fiber module. The effect of these operational parameters was investigated on the theoretical permeate water flux and power density. According to the theoretical results, the permeate water flux and the power density increased with increasing the concentration of draw solution and the flow rate of the draw solution. While decreased with increasing the feed solution concentration. By increasing the applied hydraulic pressure on the draw solution, the water flux decreased and the produced power density increased. The maximum power density and the corresponding permeate water flux of 2 M NaCl draw solution was approximately 16.414 W/m2 and 11.818 LMH respectively, which occurs at an applied hydraulic pressure of 50 bar.


D. I. Kim, J. Kim, and S. Hong, “Changing membrane orientation in pressure retarded osmosis for sustainable power generation with low fouling,” Desalination, vol. 389, 2016.

K. Touati and M. S. Rahaman, “Viability of pressure-retarded osmosis for harvesting energy from salinity gradients,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 131, no. February, p. 109999, 2020.

Z. Wang, D. Hou, and S. Lin, “Gross vs . net energy : Towards a rational framework for assessing the practical viability of pressure retarded osmosis,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 503, pp. 132–147, 2016.

F. Helfer, O. Sahin, C. Lemckert, and Y. G. Anissimov, “Salinity Gradient Energy : a New Source of Renewable Energy for,” no. February, pp. 3–13, 2013.

A. Janson, D. Dardor, M. Al Maas, J. Minier-Matar, A. Abdel-Wahab, and S. Adham, “Pressure-retarded osmosis for enhanced oil recovery,” Desalination, vol. 491, no. March, p. 114568, 2020.

N. Y. Yip and M. Elimelech, “Performance limiting effects in power generation from salinity gradients by pressure retarded osmosis,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 45, no. 23, pp. 10273–10282, 2011.

W. Y. Chia et al., “Factors affecting the performance of membrane osmotic processes for bioenergy development,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 2, 2020.

F. Helfer, C. Lemckert, and Y. G. Anissimov, “Osmotic power with Pressure Retarded Osmosis: Theory, performance and trends - A review,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 453, pp. 337–358, 2014.

K. Gerstandt, K. V. Peinemann, S. E. Skilhagen, T. Thorsen, and T. Holt, “Membrane processes in energy supply for an osmotic power plant,” Desalination, vol. 224, no. 1–3, pp. 64–70, 2008.

M. Kurihara and H. Takeuchi, “SWRO-PRO system in ‘Mega-ton Water System’ for energy reduction and low environmental impact,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2018.

W. A. N. Chunfeng, “Membrane Technology for Osmotic Power,” 2016.

M. Yasukawa, D. Shigefuji, M. Shibuya, Y. Ikebe, R. Horie, and M. Higa, “Effect of DS concentration on the PRO performance using a 5-Inch scale cellulose triacetate-based hollow fiber membrane module,” Membranes, vol. 8, no. 2, 2018.

E. Sivertsen, T. Holt, W. Thelin, and G. Brekke, “Modelling mass transport in hollow fibre membranes used for pressure retarded osmosis,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 417–418, pp. 69–79, 2012.

W. A. Phillip, J. S. Yong, and M. Elimelech, “Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: Modeling and experiments,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 13, pp. 5170–5176, 2010.

Z. L. Cheng and T. S. Chung, “Mass transport of various membrane configurations in pressure retarded osmosis (PRO),” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 537, no. May, pp. 160–176, 2017.

N. Y. Yip et al., “Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 4360–4369, 2011.

D. Xiao, W. Li, S. Chou, R. Wang, and C. Y. Tang, “A modeling investigation on optimizing the design of forward osmosis hollow fiber modules,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 392–393, pp. 76–87, 2012.

S. Shen, S. E. Kentish, and G. W. Stevens, “Shell-side mass-transfer performance in hollow-fiber membrane contactors,” Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 817–844, 2010.

T. T. Liang and R. L. Long, “Corrections to correlations for shell-side mass-transfer coefficients in the Hollow-Fiber Membrane (HFM) modules,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 44, no. 20, pp. 7835–7843, 2005.

S. Zhang, F. Fu, and T. S. Chung, “Substrate modifications and alcohol treatment on thin film composite membranes for osmotic power,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 87, pp. 40–50, 2013.

Y. Chen, C. Heng, L. Zhang, L. Setiawan, and Q. She, “Module scale-up and performance evaluation of thin fi lm composite hollow fi ber membranes for pressure retarded osmosis,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 548, no. August 2017, pp. 398–407, 2018.

K. L. Lee, R. W. Baker, and H. K. Lonsdale, “Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 141–171, 1981.

K. Touati, “Energy generation and recovery by Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO): Modeling and experiments,” 2015.

D. Bharadwaj, T. M. Fyles, and H. Struchtrup, “Multistage Pressure-Retarded Osmosis,” Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 327–347, 2016.

Q. Ge, M. Ling, and T. S. Chung, “Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: Developments, challenges, and prospects for the future,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 442, pp. 225–237, 2013.

F. A. Yaseen, A. F. Al-Alawy, and A. Sharif, “Highly-charged EDTA-2Na salt as a novel draw solution in pressure-retarded Osmosis process,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2372, no. November, 2021.

Q. She, Y. K. W. Wong, S. Zhao, and C. Y. Tang, “Organic fouling in pressure retarded osmosis: Experiments, mechanisms and implications,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 428, pp. 181–189, 2013.




How to Cite

Yaseen, F. A., Al-Alawy, A. F., & Adel Sharif. (2022). Mathematical Modeling of a Hollow Fiber Module Used in Pressure-Retarded Osmosis Process. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 23(3), 1-9.

Publication Dates