Risk-Based Inspection Due to Corrosion Consequences for Oil and Gas Flowline: A Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2022.3.9Keywords:
Oil leakage, Risk-Based Inspection (RBI), Likelihood of Failure (LOF), Consequence of Failure (COF)Abstract
The petroleum industry, which is one of the pillars of the national economy, has the potential to generate vast wealth and employment possibilities. The transportation of petroleum products is complicated and changeable because of the hazards caused by the corrosion consequences. Hazardous chemical leaks caused by natural disasters may harm the environment, resulting in significant economic losses. It significantly threatens the aim for sustainable development. When a result, determining the likelihood of leakage and the potential for environmental harm, it becomes a top priority for decision-makers as they develop maintenance plans. This study aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the risks associated with oil and gas pipelines. It also tries to identify essential risk factors in flowline projects, as well as their likelihood and severity, in order to reduce loss of life and increased expenditures as a result of safety issues. The monetary quantification was used to determine the leakage-induced environmental losses. Using a 5-by-5 probability-currency matrix, the level of environmental risk was evaluated the safety and risk-based inspection (RBI) is evaluated through the use of specific schedules to determine the likelihood of failure (LOF) and Consequence of Failure (COF). The risk level appears in the matrix, and appropriate maintenance steps should be taken to reduce risks, such as injecting corrosion inhibitors to protect the Pipelines, activating cathodic protection or coating. Overall, this research contributes to the prevention of petroleum product leakage due to the corrosion consequences in the transportation sector. Also, encourage non-environmental risk decision-makers to gain a better understanding of the risk level.
Received on 11/05/2022
Accepted on 26/06/2022
Published on 30/09/2022
References
M. I. Qureshi, R. Yusoff, S. S. Hishan, A. S. A. F. Alam, and K. Zaman, “Natural disasters and Malaysian economic growth : policy reforms for disasters management,” no. December 1965, 2019.
H. Hadi Jasim, “Evaluation the Effect of Velocity and Temperature on the Corrosion Rate of Crude Oil Pipeline in the Presence of CO2/H2S Dissolved Gases”, IJCPE, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 41–50, Jun. 2019.
Y.F. Cheng,“Monitor safety of aged oil pipelines,”Nature 529:156, 2016, doi: org/ 10.1007/ s1 1356-020-08184-7
Q. Sulaiman, A. Al – Taie, D. M. Hassan, and C. of R. and Industrial Development, “Evaluation of Sodium Chloride and Acidity Effect on Corrosion of Buried Carbon Steel Pipeline in Iraqi Soil”, IJCPE, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Mar. 2014.
H. Wang, J. Xu, W. Zhao, and J. Zhang, “Effects and Risk Evaluation of Oil Spillage in the Sea Areas of Changxing Island,” pp. 8491–8507, 2014, doi: 10.3390/ijerph110808491.
B. He, D. Zhao, J. Zhu, A. Darko, and Z. Gou, “Promoting and implementing urban sustainability in China : An integration of sustainable initiatives at different urban scales,” Habitat Int., no. October, pp. 1–11, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.10.001.
K. Shan, J. Shuai, K. Xu, and W. Zheng, “Failure probability assessment of gas transmission pipelines based on historical failure-related data and modification factors,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2018.01.049.
W.K. Muhlbauer , “Pipeline risk management manual ,” 3rd edn,2004, Gulf Publishing Companies, Houston
P. Badida, Y. Balasubramaniam, and J. Jayaprakash, “Risk evaluation of oil and natural gas pipelines due to natural hazards using fuzzy fault tree analysis,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 66, no. April, pp. 284–292, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.04.010.
J. . V. A. W. Dawotola, P.H.A.J.M van Gelder, “Risk Assessment of Petroleum Pipelines using a combined Analytical Hierarchy Process - Fault Tree analysis,” Proc. 7th Int. Probabilistic Work. Fac. Civ. Eng. Geosci. Delft Univ. Technol. Stevinweg 1, 2628CN Delft, Netherlands, vol. 13, no. 2006, pp. 491–501, 2009.
G. Qin, P. Zhang, X. Hou, S. Wu, and Y. Wang, “Risk assessment for oil leakage under the common threat of multiple natural hazards,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 16507–16520, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08184-7.
D. W. Roldán and G. F. M. De Souza, “Risk-based analysis of lng carriers loading and unloading operations,” Proc. Int. Offshore Polar Eng. Conf., vol. 4, pp. 716–724, 2012.
A. I. Journal, “Environmental Science,” Science (80-. )., vol. 288, no. 5473, pp. 1943–1943, 2000, doi: 10.1126/science.288.5473.1943a.
A. W. Al-Mithin, V. Sardesai, B. Al-Harbi, H. S. Murthy, and A. S. A. Hannan, “Risk based inspection (RBI) of aboveground storage tanks to improve asset integrity,” Int. Pet. Technol. Conf. 2011, IPTC 2011, 2011.
J. Ballesio, H. Patel, A. Revenga, and P. Rynn, “Risk assessment and technology qualification process for offshore LNG pipelines,” Offshore Technol. Conf. Proc., vol. 5, pp. 2944–2952, 2009, doi: 10.4043/otc-20301-ms.
N. M.J. Marley, C.H. Jahre-Nilsen and O.H. Bj~rn~y Det Norske Veritas Oslo and ABSTRACT, “Probability of Failure Figure 1 RBI Management Process,” Proc. Elev. Int. Offshore Pola r Eng. Conf. Stavanger, Norway, June 17-22, 2001, vol. 11, 2001.
N. Hashim Ameen, M. Kh. Mohammad, and T. M. Nafae, “Risk Assessment Due to Population Exposure to Lead Particles Emitted from Domestic Electrical Generators”, IJCPE, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 19–23, Sep. 2009.
P. T. Hogelin, J. T. Webb, Y. Ruocco, D. Vadel, and R. Hill, “Risk based internal corrosion assessment of pipe in pipe flowline,” Proc. Annu. Offshore Technol. Conf., vol. 1, pp. 384–398, 2018, doi: 10.4043/28904-ms.
D. I. Karsan et al., “Risk assessment of a tanker based floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) system in deepwater Gulf of Mexico,” Proc. Annu. Offshore Technol. Conf., vol. 2, 1999, doi: 10.4043/11000-ms.
M.J. Marley; C.H. Jahre-Nilsen; O.H. BjØrnØy , “RBI planning for pipelines. In The Eleventh International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference,”. OnePetro., Stavanger, Norway, June 2001
A. S .MainTech, Ø .Sævik, H. Wilson, J. S.Mæland, & S. V. G. Selboe,. Internal Integrity Management of Rigid Flowlines.
NFPA 704: Standard System for the Identification of the Hazards of Materials for Emergency Response
L. Hong and Y. Tang, Cheng, (2007) “Study on the classification of dangerous Hazard evaluation based on risk management method,” China Saf Sci J 17:145–150,2007, doi:org/10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.
L. Lu, W. Liang, L. Zhang, H. Zhang, Z. Lu, and J. Shan, “A comprehensive risk evaluation method for natural gas pipelines by combining a risk matrix with a bow-tie model,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., vol. 25, pp. 124–133, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.04.029.
V. Dumbravă and I. Vladut-Severian, “Using Probability – Impact Matrix in Analysis and Risk Assessment Projects,” J. Knowl. Manag. Econ. Inf. Technol., vol. 42, no. December, pp. 76–96, 2013, [Online].
G. Bower-White, “Demonstrating adequate management of risk: The move from quantitative to qualitative risk assessments,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - SPE Eur. HSE Conf. Exhib. 2013 Heal. Safety, Environ. Soc. Responsib. Oil Gas Explor. Prod. Ind., pp. 221–231, 2013, doi: 10.2118/164969-ms.
R. Barson and K. Spicer, “Pipework and vessel review and Risk Based Assessments of the North Sea Forties assets,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - 5th SPE Int. Conf. Oilf. Corros. 2010, pp. 103–110, 2010, doi: 10.2118/130525-ms.
N. A. Valdman, “Methodical approaches and results of safety analysis for offshore transport & technological systems,” Proc. Int. Offshore Polar Eng. Conf., vol. 3, pp. 571–578, 2014.
T. W. Lee and N. S. Othman, “Managing environmental incidents at oil and gas facilities before they happen,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - 9th Int. Conf. Heal. Saf. Environ. Oil Gas Explor. Prod. 2008 - "In Search Sustain. Excell., vol. 2, pp. 692–699, 2008, doi: 10.2118/111604-ms.
M. S. McDermott, “Risk Assessment (Hazard Management) Process is a continual process not a one off,” 2007, doi: 10.2118/108853-ms.
R. G. S. Suarez, F. C. Dumon, L. S. Barragan, J. McCarthy, and D. McFadyen, “A zero accident strategy for oil pipelines: Enhancing hse performance,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - SPE Int. Conf. Exhib. Heal. Safety, Environ. Sustain. 2020, HSE Sustain. 2020, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.2118/199537-MS.
O. Abifarin and S. J. Mishael, “Application of risk management principles to pipeline leak prevention in the Niger Delta,” Int. Conf. Heal. Saf. Environ. Oil Gas Explor. Prod., pp. 1–7, 2000, doi: 10.2523/62485-ms.
F. J. Deegan and K. J. Moore, “Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment of the Troll Pipeline Laying and Pull-in,” 2007, doi: 10.2523/35777-ms.
P. Areeniyom, “The use of risk-based inspection for aging pipelines in Sirikit oilfield,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - Int. Pet. Technol. Conf. 2012, IPTC 2012, vol. 3, pp. 2420–2430, 2012, doi: 10.2523/14946-ms.
G. Hill and J. Aarnes, “Development of a risk register for an integrated carbon capture and storage project,” Carbon Manag. Technol. Conf. 2012, pp. 749–758, 2012, doi: 10.2172/1747969.
D. Abia, S. Ajayi, and M. Iwegbu, “Technological risk assessment: A panacea to preventing major process incidents- A case study of amenam Kpono,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - SPE Niger. Annu. Int. Conf. Exhib. 2018, NAIC 2018, no. Oml 99, 2018, doi: 10.2118/193429-ms.
S. Matthews, M. S. Al Jaberi, and D. Mundyath, “Risk based inspection implementation for upstream offshore operator: Case study,” Soc. Pet. Eng. - 30th Abu Dhabi Int. Pet. Exhib. Conf. ADIPEC 2014 Challenges Oppor. Next 30 Years, vol. 3, pp. 1983–1996, 2014, doi: 10.2118/171862-ms.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
