Wellbore stability analysis and safe mud weight window selection in the Halfaya oil field

Authors

  • Maytham Ismael Saddam Department of Petroleum Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Iraq / Missan Oil Company, Missan, Iraq
  • Ghanim M. Farman Department of Petroleum Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Iraq https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5657-9598
  • Dhifaf Sadeq Department of Petroleum Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Iraq / Department of Petroleum Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Naji University, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2026.2.11

Keywords:

Wellbore instability; Iraqi Oil Field; Well Log Data; Principal Stress; Mud Weight

Abstract

   Drilling operations in the Halfaya oilfield frequently encounter severe wellbore instability challenges. When navigating shale deposits, wellbore instability remains the primary operational concern. Based on the analysis of the wellbore instability intervals, low-strength shale and marlstone formations are identified as the principal unstable zones that lead to non-productive time and higher drilling costs. By planning a safe operating mud window, these non-productive times and drilling costs can be mitigated. Several wellbore instability concerns have been found in a southern Iraqi oil field. A problem-diagnostic technique was done by evaluating well log data, drilling reports, mud logging reports, and pore pressure readings. In wellbore stability evaluations, the three rock failure criteria that are used the majority of the time are the Mohr-Coulomb, Mogi-Coulomb and Modified Lade criterion were used to predict a safe mud weight window. The Mogi-Coulomb and Modified Lade criteria provided more accurate predictions than the Mohr-Coulomb model in well H1. The Mohr-Coulomb criterion proved inadequate for this formation because it fails to account for the intermediate principal stress. According to the pore pressure predictions in this study, the unsuitable mud weight of 10.49 ppg is the major cause of wellbore instability during the drilling of the Nahr Umr A formation in this well; therefore, a mud weight of 14.5–15 ppg is recommended. The Formation Micro Imager (FMI) was responsible for determining the orientations of the horizontal stresses. The Halfaya oilfield has an azimuth that corresponds to a maximum horizontal stress of about N20–35 E, the findings indicate that the Nahr Umr formation is characterized by a reversal faulting regime > > . Formation lithology impacts Halfaya oilfield horizontal stress. High-strength, hardened intervals have high horizontal stress, shale and marlstone formations with low strength are the principal unstable wellbore intervals. Ultimately, to prevent breakout failures and minimize drilling fluid losses, it is recommended to either restrict wellbore inclination or employ an optimized, higher mud weight.

References

[1] M. E. Hossain and M. R. Islam, Drilling Engineering Problems and Solutions: A Field Guide for Engineers and Students. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.

[2] J. Lang, S. Li, and J. Zhang, "Wellbore stability modeling and real-time surveillance for deepwater drilling to weak bedding planes and depleted reservoirs," in SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, 2011: SPE, pp. SPE-139708-MS, https://doi.org/10.2118/139708-MS

[3] S. M. Mutar, A. A. Alhaleem, G. M. Farman, and N. N. Mahmood, "Evaluate the Smear Effect of Casing while Drilling in South Rumaila Oil Field Using Finite Element Model," Solid State Technology, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 2088-2108, 2020.

[4] B. S. Aadnoy and R. Looyeh, Petroleum rock mechanics: drilling operations and well design. Gulf professional publishing, 2019.

[5] PetroChina, "FIELD DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVISION No.1. OF HALFAYA CONTRACT AREA, IRAQ," 2018.

[6] M. S. Ameen, B. G. Smart, J. M. Somerville, S. Hammilton, and N. A. Naji, "Predicting rock mechanical properties of carbonates from wireline logs (A case study: Arab-D reservoir, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia)," Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 430-444, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.01.017

[7] W. Al-Kattan and N. J. Al-Ameri, "Estimation of the rock mechanical properties using conventional log data in North Rumaila field," Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 27-33, 2012, https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2012.4.3

[8] M. D. Zoback, Reservoir geomechanics. Cambridge university press, 2010.

[9] Z. A. Mahdi and G. M. Farman, "A Review on Models for Evaluating Rock Petrophysical Properties," Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 125-136, 2023, https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2023.1.14

[10] A. M. Ayal, D. J. Sadeq, and D. D. K. Wayo, "Machine Learning Implications for Sand Management and Geomechanical Characterization: A Case Study in the Nahr Umr Formation, Southern Iraq," Journal of Petroleum Research and Studies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 74-93, 2025, https://doi.org/10.52716/jprs.v15i1.927

[11] M. Zoback, "Reservoir geomechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK," ed, 2010.

[12] R. H. Allawi and M. S. Al-Jawad, "Wellbore instability management using geomechanical modeling and wellbore stability analysis for Zubair shale formation in Southern Iraq," Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 4047-4062, 2021/11/01 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01279-y

[13] Z. A. Mahdi and G. M. Farman, "3D Geological Model for Zubair Reservoir in Abu-Amood Oil Field," Iraqi Geological Journal, Article vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 40-50, 2023, https://doi.org/10.46717/igj.56.1B.4ms-2023-2-12

[14] K. A. Mohammed and A. A. Al-Haleem, "Optimization of hole cleaning and cuttings removal in high inclined till horizontal well," Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 61-66, 2020, https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2020.1.9

[15] F. H. Al-Mahdawi and K. Saad, "Enhancement of drilling fluid properties using nanoparticles," Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 21-26, 2018, https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2018.2.4

[16] J. C. Jaeger, N. G. Cook, and R. Zimmerman, Fundamentals of rock mechanics. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.

[17] J. J. Zhang, Applied petroleum geomechanics. Gulf Professional Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-01969-9

[18] S. S. Ganguli and S. Sen, "Investigation of present-day in-situ stresses and pore pressure in the south Cambay Basin, western India: Implications for drilling, reservoir development and fault reactivation," Marine and Petroleum Geology, vol. 118, p. 104422, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104422

[19] M. I. Saddam and G. M. Farman, "Estimation of Pore Pressure and In-Situ Stresses for Halfaya Oil Field: A Case Study," Texas Journal of Engineering and Technology, vol. 13, pp. 1-7, 2022.

[20] B. A. Eaton, "The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs," in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition?, 1975: SPE, pp. SPE-5544-MS, https://doi.org/10.2118/5544-MS

[21] K. Terzaghi, R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri, Soil mechanics in engineering practice. John wiley & sons, 1996.

[22] R. H. Allawi, M. S. Al-Jawad, and D. Alfarge, "New empirical equation to predict the pore pressure in oil reservoirs," Arabian Journal of Geosciences, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 701, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09961-z

[23] E. Fjaer, R. M. Holt, P. Horsrud, and A. M. Raaen, Petroleum related rock mechanics. Elsevier, 2008.

[24] M. J. Thiercelin and R. A. Plumb, "Core-based prediction of lithologic stress contrasts in east Texas formations," SPE Formation Evaluation, Article vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 251-258, 1994, https://doi.org/10.2118/21847-pa

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Saddam, M. I., Farman, G. M., & Sadeq, D. (2026). Wellbore stability analysis and safe mud weight window selection in the Halfaya oil field. Iraqi Journal of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, 27(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.31699/IJCPE.2026.2.11

Most read articles by the same author(s)